Comments on: More Libraries Withdraw FIFTY SHADES

By: DianeN

DianeN — Mon, 14 May 2012 16:25:17 +0000

My colleagues and I are just wondering how many of the libraries that have banned or chosen not to buy James’s books have multiple copies of Laurell K. Hamilton’s titles sitting on their shelves. The 50 Shades books are tame by comparison with the Anita Blake and Merry Gentry series!

By: Beryl Heisman

Beryl Heisman — Fri, 11 May 2012 20:40:14 +0000

As librarians, it is our job – some might say our duty, to provide our patrons with good books, bad books, scummy books, inspirational books, informational books…you name it. It is NOT our job to censor or decide what our patrons should or should not be reading. Shades of ‘Fahrenheit 451.’ It makes me shudder to think that in this day and age people are STILL trying to exert mind control over others. If you don’t want to read it, don’t read it. But don’t ever imagine that it is our job to decide what our readers should read. I don’t like the book, but I’ll fight for the right for my patrons to read it. In fact, didn’t people die for that ‘freedom of speech’ that is now so causually abused?

By: Lori

Lori — Fri, 11 May 2012 15:54:34 +0000

Is it not a part of library service to provide for the interests of the community? There are more explicit scenes in many novels classified as romance, and many books that would be deemed offensive in some way in every public library. Having said that, it is important to not let media hype determine collection development to the extent that we have a large number of a popular book that is no longer circulating a year from now. This is where the e-book version can meet the demands of a curious public.

By: Tracy

Tracy — Fri, 11 May 2012 14:35:36 +0000

I’m a public library collection development librarian who chose not to purchase this title for my system (though I’ve said I’m open to changing my mind if something changes). What’s interesting to me is that it’s not really about the book being erotica but the fact that it would be choosing to purchase FSG over a number of other titles that budget has not allowed me to purchase this year. I have lists of other titles that will have a longer shelf-life and be read by more patrons over many years, and I wouldn’t feel good right now about purchasing FSG over those.

By: Amy

Amy — Fri, 11 May 2012 13:57:13 +0000

I’m a public librarian too and my library just added copies. That’s what we do when something is in demand. Also we take intellectual freedom and freedom to read seriously. Isn’t that what public libraries are about? I’m proud of our library for continuing to make decisions about what our community wants rather than what we think they should want. It’s a sad day when public libraries aren’t defending a person’s rights to read what they want.

By: Anne

Anne — Thu, 10 May 2012 21:45:59 +0000

I am a public librarian and our library chose not to add the Fifty Shades trilogy to our collection. It is part of our collection development policy that we do not buy books classified as erotica. . Many libraries have this in their collection development policy. If libraries are purchasing this series and then pulling it from their shelves, what are their collection development staff doing? Don’t they read reviews of books before they purchase? I knew what these books were about months before patrons started requesting them because of helpful blogs like this one (and Jezebel) : )

By: Greg

Greg — Thu, 10 May 2012 18:50:33 +0000

It is a dark day for the profession (assuming of course the people making these stupid decisions were actually librarians).